Enrollment Report for the CHUH City School District

Based on a request from the Ohio School Facilities Commission, FutureThink was contracted to develop enrollment projections for Cleveland Heights-University Heights City School District. This report contains ten-year enrollment projections for the Cleveland Heights-University Heights City School District. Enrollment projections were developed by analyzing the following data:

  • Live birth data
  • Historical enrollment
  • Community school enrollment
  • Open enrollment
  • Community demographics
  • Housing information

The projections presented in this report are meant to serve as a planning tool for the future, and, with the historical data and anticipated growth, represent the most likely direction of the District.

Enrollment for the 2022-23 school year is projected to be 5,481. Enrollment for the 2017-18 school year is 5,612, which is the master planning year.

Please see the letter and report below for more information:

Enrollment Projection Letter

Enrollment Projection Report

Advertisements
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Lay Facilities Committee Presentation to the CH-UH Board of Education

The Lay Facilities Committee (LFC) presented its recommendations for a school facilities plan to the Cleveland Heights-University Heights Board of Education at the board’s May 7 meeting.  The LFC has met approximately every three weeks since last October.

The LFC plan maintains the current grade configuration of K–5 in elementary school buildings and 6–8 grades in middle schools. It maintains five of the current seven elementary buildings and closes one of three middle schools. The Board will now decide whether or not to put a bond issue for Phase 1 on the November 2013 ballot. Phase 1 includes renovating the high school and Monticello and Roxboro Middle Schools.

1 LFC Final Report for BoE

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Follow the work of the CH-UH Lay Facilities committee

http://chuhfacilities.org/

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

October 8, 2012 – CH-UH Lay Facilities Committee Begins Work

In August 2012, in response to a request that grew out of a community meeting convened by FutureHeights and Reaching Heights,the CH-UH Board of Education  established a Lay Facilities Committee. A Cleveland Heights Patch article about that meeting is here.

At its Oct. 2, 2012 meeting, the CH-UH Board of Education discussed the charge they’re giving the Lay Facilities Committee. Broadly, the committee’s task is to come up with recommendations on a plan that is educationally sound (relying on the expertise and input of our district’s instructional leaders) and fiscally responsible and can enjoy broad community support. The goal is to place a facilities bond issue on the November 2013 ballot.

The committee understands that Plan C, which the board accepted last year, is open for revision.

The committee’s goals include the need to engage the community to build consensus around several aspects of a plan, including

– Confirm need for master facilities plan.

– Identify key community values that should drive the process.

– Determine what the community will embrace and support regarding several aspects of the plan, including:

– Which buildings are kept open or are closed.

– What is an acceptable price tag for the project, which will drive millage of a bond issue?

– What mix of funding sources will pay for the project?

– What is the best timeline and sequence of any phasing of the project?

For the Board of Education to place a bond issue on the November 2013 ballot, they will need to act next July. Board members asked that the committee provide its report no later than early May, 2013.

An organizational meeting of the lay facilities committee was held Oct. 3 at Heights High.

The next meeting of the committee will be Wednesday, Oct. 24, at 7pm at Gearity Professional Development School, 2323 Wrenford Road in University Heights. This and all committee meetings are open to the public.

The committee’s blog can be found at chuhfacilities.org

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

June 21, 2012

Plan C

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

A Master Facilities Update from Supt. Doug Heuer

The Cleveland Heights and University Heights communities have spent the last two years giving voice to their ideas, wants and needs about school facilities. Substantial work has been done in that time.  Beginning in early 2011, the District brought together more than 50 community members, elected officials, staff and experts to begin planning how we should address our facilities challenges.

And those challenges are significant. The first things the Citizen Facilities Committee learned included a few critical facts:

  • CH-UH hasn’t substantially renovated or improved our facilities in 40 years.
  • Every one of our schools is in need of major repairs. The complete cost of repairing the district’s facilities is more than $40 million.
  • Classrooms of the past can’t provide students with the education they need to be successful in today’s increasingly technology-driven world. If we only repair what needs to be fixed, we do our children a disservice. They need classrooms that allow them to learn 21st Century skills.
  • We have fewer students now than in the past, and as a result we have a lot of space that is going unused. Heating, cooling and cleaning this extra space is an unnecessary expense and these funds could be better used elsewhere.  If we create new, efficient buildings and demolishing buildings that aren’t environmentally or pocketbook friendly, we can better serve our students, community and environment.

The results of all this information led the Citizens Facilities Committee to determine that the CH-UH School District need a comprehensive facilities plan, one that envisioned buildings that meet the needs of today’s education and tomorrow’s students. This plan would mean that we wouldn’t continue to throw good money after bad, wasting the community’s money on costly Band-Aids, but instead tackle the issues at the source. Just as importantly, it would have to take into consideration a realistic assessment of what this community can afford.

Following the recommendation of the Citizens Facilities Committee, the District spent a year and a half talking with members of the community about what it would like – and not like – to see in the new facilities. It convened large-scale community Master Facilities Planning meetings and smaller community conversation at local libraries and coffee shops. We took the most popular and practical ideas from these meetings and worked with our architects to create Plan C, the Community Plan.

Compromises have been made to the Plan along the way, but in order to do this right and address all of this community’s needs, the plan had to be comprehensive. Every comprehensive plan comes with a price tag. This is the least expensive plan that still does what the community has been asking for.  The Plan would use renovation in some places and new construction in others to create school facilities that address our needs in a way we can afford.

The need is immediate and great.  At the moment, we don’t have one science lab in the entire District that meets current state standards.  A recent leak at Roxboro Elementary caused more than $150,000 in damages. The lighting and temperatures in our classrooms, our air quality, and our building acoustics are unsafe, outdated or inefficient. These are just a few of our serious problems.

Plan C calls for some renovation and some new construction, and new construction will require demolition.  No one likes replacing school buildings that have rich histories and hold fond memories for so many CH-UH alumni and parents, but it is a necessary step to make our district more cost-efficient and more effective. The smaller space will be less expensive to heat, cool and maintain and will save our District more than $3 million in operating savings every year.

Plan C will allow us to be consistent with the new state model curriculum and the designations for grade levels for teacher licensure. It will also eliminate staffing problems and allow our teachers to teach a variety of classes without switching buildings.

Plan C will allow us to support our teachers. Our current buildings are not designed for collaboration. They’re conducive to lectures; one-way learning does not engage students in meaningful ways, prompt curiosity or encourage questions.

Plan C will create “Learning Communities,” spaces that foster collaboration among teachers and students. A 2011 study, “The Missing Link in School Reform” shows students are more successful when teachers and students think together.  A 2011 report in the American Educational Research Journal, “Problem-Based Learning in K-12 Education,” also echoes that sentiment. It found a 200 – 400% improvement in in learning outcomes with authentically student-driven, enquiry-based learning, which we will be able to achieve through Plan C’s Learning Communities. And our teachers agree. You can hear their thoughts here: http://www.chuh.org/multimedia/videos/detail/oxford-facilities-pilot

We understand Plan C comes with a price tag, and we see this as an investment in our students and communities. The District is doing everything it can to make our ideal schools financially feasible.

We are tapping into private funding to absorb major parts of cost for a swimming pool, a performing arts center, our Learning Community configurations at the elementary level, career tech learning spaces and a new stadium.

We all have the best interests of our students and our neighborhoods at heart. We ask you please continue to work with us and support Plan C, “The Community Plan,” our community’s plan.  Together, we can have schools that teach today and tomorrow’s students the 21st Century skills they need at a price we can afford.

Next steps:

The first formal vote to put a bond issue on the November ballot is expected at the board’s meeting Tuesday, July 3. This meeting will be streamed live on our website at www.chuh.org.

At the July 3, meeting the board will vote on three resolutions:

1)   A resolution determining the district is a special needs district.

2)   A resolution authorizing the auditor to determine a millage based on the budget and to craft the ballot language.

3)    A resolution to adopt the comprehensive plan in order for the district to qualify for funding from the Ohio School Facilities Commission.

If the Board votes yes to the three resolutions, then at the July 17 board meeting, they would vote on a final resolution to approve the millage and final ballot language.

Sun Press article on Plan C

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Exploring the Relationship between Facility and Learning

A few thoughts on the impact of facility on the education process-

http://www.coe.uga.edu/sdpl/articlesandpapers/lyons.html

http://www2.ed.gov/offices/OESE/archives/inits/construction/impact2.html

http://www.ecoliteracy.org/essays/when-building-teacher

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment